Why Weekly Therapy Isn’t Always Enough for Selective Mutism
TL;DR: The Quick Download
Selective Mutism (SM) is maintained by negative reinforcement: child avoidance + adult accommodation that brings short-term relief but inadvertently strengthens silence in the long-term.
Children may face dozens – even hundreds – of speaking opportunities each school day, meaning each moment becomes a repetition of either anxious avoidance or brave talking.
Exposure-based treatment depends on warm coaching, repetition, and sensitive pacing – which isn’t always best served by one-hour, once-weekly treatment sessions alone.
Expert-led intensives (2+ hours of treatment per day) allow for a greater ‘dose’ of effective exposure practice in a concentrated period of time.
Weekly sessions and groups can serve as important boosters – but often work best alongside higher-frequency, intensive treatment formats.
Many families start with weekly therapy. It feels measured. Manageable. Appropriate. And sometimes it is.
But Selective Mutism (SM) does not operate on a once-a-week schedule. It unfolds in classrooms, cafeterias, playgrounds, and hallways — across dozens of speaking opportunities every single day. To understand why weekly therapy can fall short, we have to understand how SM is maintained — and what actually drives meaningful change.
Book a Discovery Call with Square One Psychology today.
Selective mutism is maintained by negative reinforcement.
Selective Mutism (SM) is not simply shyness. It is an anxiety disorder in which a child’s ability to speak is inhibited in specific environments despite speaking comfortably elsewhere. What keeps SM going is not defiance or stubbornness — it is negative reinforcement. When a child avoids speaking, their anxiety drops in the moment. Adults often step in, reduce demands, or accept nonverbal responses; all inadvertently supporting the child’s avoidance. Ultimately, that incremental relief — felt by both child and adult — strengthens the loop of silence over time (Cornacchio et al., 2019; Oerbeck et al., 2018).
In any given school day, a child may be asked dozens — sometimes upwards of a hundred — questions. Each one is a fork in the road: speak or avoid. When avoidance is repeatedly reinforced, those pathways become deeply embedded.
Why Once-Weekly Therapy Often Isn’t Enough.
Effective treatment for SM is exposure-based. It relies on a steady, warm relationship with an adult brave talking “coach”, repetition, and careful pacing that allows a child to tolerate discomfort while gently stretching — and strengthening — their brave talking muscles (Peris et al., 2020). But in a 45–60 minute weekly session, time is limited.
There is warm-up time. Regulation time. Relationship time. All of which are essential. But that leaves less time for the volume of exposures needed to counteract five full days of reinforced avoidance at school.
Why Intensives Change The Equation.
Intensive treatment formats compress repetition into shorter windows. In multi-day intensive group behavioral treatment programs like our Mighty Mouth Kids Camp — a proxy classroom environment — our team of expert clinicians can control the adults in the room (i.e., Counselors), the peer group size, and the pace of brave challenges across a given hour or day. This allows children to accumulate successful speaking repetitions rapidly, building momentum in a manner that is difficult to replicate in one-hour once-weekly sessions alone (Carpenter et al., 2018; Cornacchio et al., 2019).
School-based intensives serve a different but equally powerful function. By entering the classroom as the child’s 1:1 support, our team of expert clinicians can guide exposures in real time — something most school staff are not trained to structure independently. At the same time, teachers receive live coaching so they can replicate and extend those gains once the clinician steps out.
Where Weekly Work Still Fits.
Weekly sessions and 90-minute group “booster” treatment sessions absolutely have a place. They can support generalization, reinforce skills, and provide structured peer practice — especially when layered alongside intensive treatment or concurrent parent coaching.
But when speech has been absent for extended periods, when avoidance is deeply embedded, or when progress has plateaued, increasing treatment frequency often becomes clinically indicated.
The Bottom Line.
Selective Mutism changes through supported action — not insight alone. When treatment frequency begins to match the frequency of avoidance, change accelerates. And when brave speech is practiced repeatedly, in warm and well-structured environments, momentum builds.
Step into your brave. Start at Square One.
References
Carpenter, A. L., Pincus, D. B., & Comer, J. S. (2018). Extending parent–child interaction therapy for early childhood internalizing problems: Advances for anxiety and selective mutism. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 21(1), 1–20.
Cornacchio, D., Crum, K. I., Coxe, S., Pincus, D. B., & Comer, J. S. (2019). Intensive group behavioral treatment for children with selective mutism: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87(8), 720–733.
Oerbeck, B., Overgaard, K. R., Stein, M. B., Pripp, A. H., & Kristensen, H. (2018). Treatment of selective mutism: A 5-year follow-up study. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(8), 997–1009.
Peris, T. S., et al. (2020). Exposure therapy process and outcomes in childhood anxiety disorders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 124, 103–113.